As a Dedicated Capitalist, Yet Medicare for All Represents the Top Solution for US Healthcare
Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.
Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.
Our Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive
Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.
Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.
When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.
I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.
How National Health Insurance Would Work
A national health insurance program would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.
Does this appear like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.
Execution for America
For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.
Benefits for Entrepreneurs
A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).
It would enable simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.
Addressing Concerns
Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.
Need for Honest Assessment
As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.